Actualizado: 28-04-23. Total de serum faciales analizados: 43. Selección de productos en base a los pedidos de análisis realizados por integrantes del movimiento GoodVibes. Los productos son ordenados por la calidad de sus ingredientes de mejor (puntaje 10) a peor (0).

¿Tu producto favorito no está en el ranking? Envíanos una foto de tu producto por instagram (goodvibesmovement.in) o a team@goodvibesmovement.in, y lo analizaremos para vos.

El Ranking GoodVibes es elaborado considerando el riesgo potencial para la salud y el ambiente de los ingredientes de cada producto en base a la última evidencia científica disponible.

El análisis de ingredientes ha sido elaborado por investigadores del CONICET (*) en base a las siguientes referencias bibliográficas:

Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) 2020. CIR Assessments.
EC (Environment Canada). 2008. Domestic Substances List Categorization. Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) Environmental Registry.
Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Standards for Cosmetics (2006).
Berardesca E, et al., J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019
33(7):25-33.
Berardesca, E., T. Zuberbier, M. Sanchez Viera, and M. Marinovich. Review of the safety of octocrylene used as an ultraviolet filter in cosmetics. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 33 (2019): 25-33.
http://www.safecosmetics.org/get-the-facts/chemicals-of-concern/homosalate/. Insufficient data to make a “generally recognized as safe and effective” (S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use: proposed rule. Fed Regist. 2019
84(38):6204-6275. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-2-26/pdf/2019-3019.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2019).
European Commission Legislation (Regulation (EC) N° 1223/2009 y 2019/831, Annexes I to VI and all the amendments to the cosmetics regulation).
California Department of Public Health – California Safe Cosmetics Program, August 2016.
SCCP (2006) Opinion on Benzophenone-3. European Commission – The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers. SCCP/1069/06 Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/sccp_opinions_en.htm.
List of Safe and/or Natural Ingredients
Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Propylene Glycol and Polypropylene Glycols. (1994). Journal of the American College of Toxicology, 13(6), 437–491.
US – FOOD & DRUG Administration (FDA). Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) Substances (SCOGS) Database (SCOGS Number 27,1973. Conclusion 1)
Material Safety Data Sheet MSDS# 96171
Chasset, F., Soria, A., Moguelet, P., Mathian, A., Auger, Y., François, C., and Barete, S. (2015). Contact dermatitis due to ultrasound gel: A case report and published work review. The Journal of dermatology.
Bohn, S., and Bircher, A. J. (2001). Phenoxyethanol induced urticaria. Allergy, 56(9), 922-923.
CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review). Safety Assessment of Acrylates Copolymers as Used in Cosmetics (2018).
Rillig, M. C., et al. (2019). Microplastic effects on plants. New Phytologist, 223(3), 1066-1070.
Sussarellu, R., et al. (2016). Oyster reproduction is affected by exposure to polystyrene microplastics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(9), 2430-2435.
K. Aschenbeck, E. Warshaw. Allergenic Ingredients in Facial Wet Wipes. Dermatitis (2017) 28(6):353–359
A. C. de Groot, H. L. M. van der Meeren, J. Willem Weyland. Contact Dermatitis (1988) 19: 77-78
Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR)
Final Report of the Amended Safety Assessment (2004). International Journal of Toxicology, 23 (2), 55–94.
SCCNFP (The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers) 1999. Opinion concerning fragrance allergy in consumers. A review of the problem. Analysis of the need for appropriate consumer information and identification of consumer allergens. SCCNFP/0017/98 Final. December 199 – Tatyana Hamilton and Gillian C de Gannes. 2011. Allergic contact dermatitis to preservatives and fragrances in cosmetics. Skin therapy letter 16(4), 1-4 .- Anne Birgitte Simonsen, Mette Deleuran, Jeanne Duus Johansen and Mette Sommerlund 2011. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children – a review of current data. Contact dermatitis 65(5), 254-65.
European Chemical Agency (ECHA)
CIR (Cosmetic Ingredient Review). CIR Compendium, containing abstracts, discussions, and conclusions of CIR cosmetic ingredient safety assessments (Washington DC, 2006).
CowanEllsberry, C.E., Dyer, S.D., Erhardt, S., Bernhard, M.J., Roe, A.L., Dowty, M.E., Weisbrod, A.V., 2008. Approach for extrapolating in vitro metabolism data to refine bioconcentration factor estimates. Chemosphere 70, 180-1817. Dyer, S.D., Bernhard, M.J., CowanEllsberry, C., Perdu-Durand, E., Demmerle, S., Cravedi, J.-P., 2008. In vitro biotransformation of surfactants in fish. Part I: Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (C12-LAS) and alcohol ethoxylate (C13EO8). Chemosphere 72, 850-862. Peter Fisk Associates Limited (2012) Position paper: Bioaccumulation of Aliphatic Alcohols in the context of REACH registration. Reference: PFA.197.18.02. Date: 10 August 2012.
Lanigan RS, Yamarik TA. Int J Toxicol. 2002, 21 Suppl 2:95‐142.
Orenstein, A., Kostenich, G., Tsur, H., Roitman, L., Ehrenberg, B., & Malik, Z. (1995) in Photodynamic therapy of cancer II (Vol. 2325, pp. 100-105). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Bråred Christensson J, Andersen KE, Bruze M, et al. Contact Dermatitis. 2012,67(5):247-259.

(*) Según el ranking SCImago 2020, el CONICET alcanza la segunda posición entre las instituciones académicas y de investigación más prestigiosas de América Latina. A nivel mundial, ocupa la posición 230 entre 7000 instituciones privadas y gubernamentales.